Restart
15 of 20
A well-written literature review:
- A Avoids evaluation or critique of the literature reviewed, so as not to bias the opinion of the reader.
- B Emphasizes critique and synthesis of the work of others that is related to your own research problem.
- C Avoids summarizing the work of others so that details of the original work are not lost in the reviewing process.
- D Emphasizes detailed reporting of each piece of research included in the literature review.
That's Correct!
It's Wrong!
A well-written literature review emphasizes critique and synthesis of the work of others that is related to your own research problem. This means that instead of simply summarizing the work of others, the review critically evaluates and analyzes the research in relation to your own research topic. By doing so, it helps to identify gaps in the existing literature, highlight areas of disagreement or agreement, and provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field. This approach allows the reader to form their own opinion based on the synthesized information, without being biased by the reviewer's personal evaluation or critique.
